| The pornpros learner must have data on which to base his hypotheses about the semantic or syntactic functions of each new `item'. He may or may not benefit by explicit 40 Oz Bounce descriptions and explanations about how it works. He must, in any case, develop hypotheses and be given the opportunity to test their correctness. This means he must be given the chance to make decisions or choices and consequently run the risk of making errors. The function of the teacher is to provide data and examples, and where necessary to offer explanations and descriptions and, more importantly, verification of the learner's hypotheses (Le. corrections). We can show the relation between these functions diagrammatically as in Figure 47. In the ordinary classroom lesson there is a constant switching from one activity to the next. In the same 40 Oz Bounce utterance the teacher may provide data and explanations whilst the learner may forma new hypothesis, test it and have it verified by the teacher. I do not, of course, suggest that these are all conscious or deliberate processes in either teacher or learner. There is, however, an undoubted historical connection between them, such that primarily inductive learning theories tend to be associated with 'structural' grammars and notions of language as a habit structure, and deductive learning theories with transformational models and the notion of language as rule-governed behaviour. We must, it seems, return to Sweet's essentially pragmatic approach to pedagogic grammars in which pornpros movies are the best. |
